In today's rapidly growing world, deprived nations are still struggling to provide better healthcare, improved education and good source of income to their citizens. In these countries, people are fighting for their basic rights of living. Successful countries can support minor one's to improve their living standards. I totally accede with the notion that prosperous countries should contribute more in this regard.
To commence with, advance countries can help needy countries in many ways. In the field of healthcare, they can provide needy countries with latest equipment of medical field to cure disease like cancer. Moreover developed countries can send their expert doctors in necesstious countries to train their medical staff and open free campaigns to make aware people of unhealthy lifestyles. Also, they can help in vaccination programs so there can be substantial decrease in infant mortality numbers.
Secondly, assistance in the sector of education can also be very appreciated by developing countries. Prosperous countries should provide funds to the needy one's to open new schools and colleges. They should also give opportunities to students to study in their institutes so that talented one's can also gain higher studies.
Furthermore, reducing barriers to international trades such as import and export duties and tarrifs can also help poor countries to improve their economy. This initiative should help people of needy countries to grow.
To conclude, in this sophisticated era, if we want to live with peace and harmony, we should help each other. Therefore, i agree that rich nations should help poor countries in every field if possible.
Today, although people in
Today, although people in many developed countries have a good lifestyle, individuals in developing countries are still in trouble to provide essentials for their lives. Some people believe for having a good lifestyle poorer nations must improve the level of health, education, and trade. However, for this goal, developed countries are in charge to help them. I personally agree with this idea that I will discuss it in the following.
As a matter of fact, it is noticeable to know that helping the poorer nations not only will be improved the people's lifestyles in such areas but also it has some benefits for the developed countries. One of the main benefits is that it would prevent the immigration of many people from such areas to the developed countries. In fact, annually, a huge number of individuals immigrate to richer countries to get access to a better life. In point of fact, in poorer countries, people suffer from a lack of facilities such as health care services, education, and so on. Moreover, in such countries, due to the recession, there are no available employment opportunities for all people. Therefore, many people in low-income countries migrate to welfare countries in dreams of having a good life. However, heaps of immigration will make a lot of difficulties for both immigrants and citizens in developed countries. As for some of the difficulties, firstly, immigration would increase the population in a certain area. In fact, it might be hard for the authority to manage a huge number of people in a country. To illustrate this vividly, it might be challenging for the government to put regulations in the country because immigrants come from different cultures and ethnicity. Therefore, each of them has some rituals or festivals that they would like to follow them and thus it would be difficult to put particular rules for all of them. In addition, with the growing population, citizens will be confronted with some other issues such as the loss of job opportunities, air pollution, and so on.
Although, some richer nations think helping to poorer countries do not have any profit for them and they should extensively invest on their own countries, it should be considered that in many developing countries, there are different types of natural resources such as precious mines, petroleum, and even the best pasture and agricultural lands. In fact, many occupations can be created in these areas and the trade would be able to flourish there. In fact, developed countries would be able to invest in these areas to make manufactures and increase the trade between two nations. In this case, poorer countries also would economically progress and eventually the manner of people’s lives will improve.
To conclude, I am of the opinion that helping to poorer nations by welfare nations have some benefits for both nations. The most significant benefit is the reduction of excessive immigrants to developed countries. Alternatively, the trade between communities will significantly increase that it would influence the improvement of people lives in poorer countries.
Today, although people in
Today, although people in many developed countries have a good lifestyle, individuals in developing countries are still in trouble to provide essentials for their lives. Some people believe for having a good lifestyle poorer nations must improve the level of health, education, and trade. However, for this goal, developed countries are in charge to help them. I personally agree with this idea that I will discuss it in the following.
As a matter of fact, it is noticeable to know that helping the poorer nations not only will be improved the people's lifestyles in such areas but also it has some benefits for the developed countries. One of the main benefits is that it would prevent the immigration of many people from such areas to the developed countries. In fact, annually, a huge number of individuals immigrate to richer countries to get access to a better life. In point of fact, in poorer countries, people suffer from a lack of facilities such as health care services, education, and so on. Moreover, in such countries, due to the recession, there are no available employment opportunities for all people. Therefore, many people in low-income countries migrate to welfare countries in dreams of having a good life. However, heaps of immigration will make a lot of difficulties for both immigrants and citizens in developed countries. As for some of the difficulties, firstly, immigration would increase the population in a certain area. In fact, it might be hard for the authority to manage a huge number of people in a country. To illustrate this vividly, it might be challenging for the government to put regulations in the country because immigrants come from different cultures and ethnicity. Therefore, each of them has some rituals or festivals that they would like to follow them and thus it would be difficult to put particular rules for all of them. In addition, with the growing population, citizens will be confronted with some other issues such as the loss of job opportunities, air pollution, and so on.
Although, some richer nations think helping to poorer countries do not have any profit for them and they should extensively invest on their own countries, it should be considered that in many developing countries, there are different types of natural resources such as precious mines, petroleum, and even the best pasture and agricultural lands. In fact, many occupations can be created in these areas and the trade would be able to flourish there. In fact, developed countries would be able to invest in these areas to make manufactures and increase the trade between two nations. In this case, poorer countries also would economically progress and eventually the manner of people’s lives will improve.
To conclude, I am of the opinion that helping to poorer nations by welfare nations have some benefits for both nations. The most significant benefit is the reduction of excessive immigrants to developed countries. Alternatively, the trade between communities will significantly increase that it would influence the improvement of people lives in poorer countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...hcare, they can provide needy countries with latest equipment of medical field to cure dise...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ical field to cure disease like cancer. Moreover developed countries can send their expe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
..., we should help each other. Therefore, i agree that rich nations should help poo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49612403101 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75702118152 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2303309297 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131449888549 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522775953286 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344742486995 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882337111819 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397676684798 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.