Nowadays, the expansion of the tourism sector in developing countries is an alarming trend to build a nation's economy. And, I believe that this kind of development has its own merits and demerits which could be further explained in a detailed manner.
There are a certain number of reasons for this ongoing trend of focusing on the growth of infrastructure services in developing nations. However, I will be explaining the two well-known prominent reasons. Firstly, It helps locals to build businesses which in turn flourishes the economy of a country. To exemplify, many multinational companies which have been set up in developing nations are given an opportunity to locals to build small businesses in their region. Those businesses are hotels, restaurants, and convenient means of transport. This kind of opportunity has not only created more employment for the residents but also has generated huge revenue in the tourism industry of a nation. Secondly, the tourism sector plays an important role by building relationships with other countries when a foreign citizen comes to travel to another nation for work or vacation. In other words, a person who comes for a holiday to another country gets a chance to learn about their culture and tradition. By visiting a new place, he or she builds relationships with locals of that particular region in the form of friendship. Therefore, the above two reasons justify why developing countries are expanding the tourism industry.
Like I said earlier, this kind of development has brought advantages and disadvantages to developing countries. On the one hand, it has created new jobs for locals by inclining the rate of employment which in turn has built an economy of a country. This could be viewed by a recent survey from Oxford University which has shown that more than fifty percent of revenue in the tourism sector is generated from countries like India, Sri Lanka, South Africa, and other emergent nations. On the other hand, I think that the expansion of the tourism sector has given drawbacks to indigenous people. Chiefly, environmental contamination such as air pollution, water pollution has been increased due to the visit of foreign tourists that has affected the lives of local citizens in a particular region. Locals are not able to sustain a healthier environment for themselves because of outsiders contaminating their regions while polluting them. For instance, many tourists coming to the Himalayas are throwing plastics in the lakes and rivers instead of dustbins which results contaminates the water and becoming a slow poison to locals.
To conclude, the development of the tourism sector has given a prime benefit to locals by creating employment and establishing different businesses in their region, however, it has also negatively impacted the environmental conditions which could be encountered if government take necessary steps to prevent such problems with the growth of tourism industry.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...untries is an alarming trend to build a nations economy. And, I believe that this kind ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detailed manner" with adverb for "detailed"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...merits which could be further explained in a detailed manner. There are a certain number of reas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, kind of, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2508.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 474.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29113924051 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96876149899 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1542555969 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161308636134 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513888726708 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460708527335 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102877175553 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223403459756 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...untries is an alarming trend to build a nations economy. And, I believe that this kind ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detailed manner" with adverb for "detailed"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...merits which could be further explained in a detailed manner. There are a certain number of reas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, kind of, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2508.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 474.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29113924051 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96876149899 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1542555969 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161308636134 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513888726708 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460708527335 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102877175553 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223403459756 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.