With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree?
The notion that growing populace interact with each other through mass media technology and hence, one to one conversation is consider as old fashion mode.To some extent I agree with the above stated statement.
Firstly, to begin with, communication channel survey in 2013 revealed the abundant group of residents are operating the computer and smart technology for their intercourse with friends and peers as compared hitherto years. In addition, the enormous number of inhabitants chosen their comfort zones and prefer utilizing their mobile phones and laptops for connecting with people around the globe. For instance, many contradictory effects were observed, and one foremost is too get-off from socializing.
Secondly, modus vivendi of citizens and availability of technological innovations portrayed an integral role in manifesting the options for conversation. Nevertheless, ancient groups of individuals like to have tangible chitchat with their friends and family and enjoy quality time. For instance, it is apparent that availability of smart tools were limited and residents mingled in physical interaction. On contrary, people of this era have restrained themselves from live chat and face-to-face meeting because they are obsessed with smart gadgets’ and love to be isolated from people around them or perhaps their busy life style has limited them from this activity.
Thirdly, privacy issue had influenced young generation from tangible hang out with friends and family is another reason. Consequently, they consider this mode of communication as primitive fashion.
To conclude, both ways of conversation are equally imperative for human beings, however; it is about perception and life style which persuade us to opt for the convenient mode for conversing with people around us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...y and hence, one to one conversation is consider as old fashion mode.To some extent I ag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...rsation is consider as old fashion mode.To some extent I agree with the above stat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70848708487 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94277146045 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3711138735 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115445075371 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410044579987 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339294676479 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630115852914 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265003872353 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.