There is more to control of traffic and pollution than soaring the price of petrol. By technology growth, unavoidable air pollution and traffic jams have become a significant problem. Furthermore, increasing petrol price maybe can helpful for declining traffic bars, but air pollution cannot be controlled by this solution because there are majority of factors that have effects on pollution.
Unfortunately, car manufactures and factories think about their benefits rather than the consequences of their products on our planet and future generation’s life. Furthermore, the capacity of our roads are highly less than the number of vehicles that are produced. Also, the quality of petrol sometimes is not good enough for consumption.
Therefore, by soaring petrol prices, we can see traffic bars and pollutants are still sensible. Although, people may decide to don’t use their cars in unnecessary times but incredible number of vehicles don’t allow for controlling traffic and pollution.
For controlling traffic, some infrastructures should have been considered. For example, governments should encourage people for using bicycle rather than cars, and it needs construction of special roads for bikers. Also, more roads should be designed for declining traffic bars, and ordinary cars should be replaced by electric cars.
However, for pollution, thinking about controlling traffic would not be enough. It needs fundamental programs such as producing high quality petrols, decreasing green house gases by reducing number of factories, vehicles and CFCs, planting more trees and stoping deforestation.
All in all, human being’s activities make our lovely planet become ill and ozone depletion. We are all responsible for making these drastic conditions. Therefore, we should rescue our planet as soon as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...lled by this solution because there are majority of factors that have effects on polluti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is sometimes
...e produced. Also, the quality of petrol sometimes is not good enough for consumption. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75824175824 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94578381082 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0036938055 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121346620325 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480628170244 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507224198346 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655058667633 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590036613349 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.