Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective?

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?

Many aver that increasing prices on gas will lead to the alleviation and even solving of pollution and traffic problems. I disagree with this prospect and below reasons on which my stance is based as well as possible solutions will be discussed in details.
To begin with, the belief that rocketing prices will solve issues with environment and traffic is questionable. For instance, prices of gasoline have been rising steadily since the 1990s in many countries and this trend has not worked as a deterrent. In fact, during this period of time, the number of cars on the roads has increased dramatically and consequently, both problems have worsened gradually. Thus, it is safe to assume that further rise in prices will not lead to the desirable results.
However, the discussed problems may be addressed effectively in several ways. The most efficient and most controversial solution would be making driving inconvenient. In fact, owning a car provides individuals with many benefits and taking them away may work. To illustrate, expensive parking or even absence of available parking lots near blocks of flats, workplaces, malls and strict speed limits could make driver’s life miserable. If driving an automobile provides a commuter with no advantages, he will likely to abandon it. In fact, those policies have been introduced in London and they have proven to be working well. Thus, discouraging driving through making it troublesome seems to be working.
Finally, raising awareness about the problems caused by car emissions among public would be an apt deterrent as well. This measure will be particularly useful if an accentuation is done on the adverse effect of CO2 on the health of human beings. Many people are seriously concerned with their progeny well-being. If people understood that driving a vehicle causes cancer to them and their beloved ones, the number of commuters who use an automobile will likely sharply drop. Moreover, if public stops driving, the traffic problem will be resolved automatically. Thus discouraging driving via rising awareness appears to be an efficient measure.
In conclusion, although many assume that increasing prices on petrol will force people to give up driving, it seems not to be working. At the same time, such measures as passing new restrictions on the roads and increasing public knowledge about the disadvantageous impact of using a car with an engine powered by fossil fuel on the planet and people seem to be addressing the issue in discussion aptly.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ed as a deterrent. In fact, during this period of time, the number of cars on the roads has in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, even so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20147420147 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86350539429 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560196560197 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6884909623 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.80952381 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120232223599 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408035956774 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413476951817 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813551714451 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356013663599 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
The content for 'To what extent do you agree or disagree? ' is too short compared to another question: 'What other measures do you think might be effective?'

they should be equal to the content, or the firs question will be considered more important with relatively more content.

----------------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 407 350
No. of Characters: 2060 1500
No. of Different Words: 225 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.492 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.061 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.759 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 162 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.381 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.015 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.762 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.278 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.278 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5