Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective?

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

What other measures do you think might be effective?

Traffic congestion and pollution problems go hand in hand. These are two sides of the same coin. In order to eradicate this governing bodies think petrol costs should be increased. In this essay I shall shed some light on this issue and suggest the measures that can be taken to mitigate the problem.

Traffic problem particularly in metropolitan cities and high level of pollution due to this has always been a matter of concern. To control this increasing petrol prices is not going to help as it will have many drawbacks on the society. Firstly, it could lead to an increase prices of many goods, products, vegetables etc.which are transported in heavy vehicles from one place to another. This would pinch the pockets of middle and low class people of our society. Secondly, it would limit an individual's liberty to travel freely for any purpose be it recreational, office or meeting friends and relatives. This could have an adverse effect on one's personal and social life.

To deal with traffic and pollution problems more effectively government should work towards improving the standards and frequency of public transportation. It should be easily accessible and should be comfortable to travel. Following to this the roads should be repaired and maintained in a timely manner. Government should invest in constructing new roads & flyovers in order to solve the traffic issue.

To conclude I believe instead of increasing petrol prices government should take the steps mentioned which will solve traffic issue to a great extent thus solving pollution problems.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ur society. Secondly, it would limit an individuals liberty to travel freely for any purpos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...roads should be repaired and maintained in a timely manner. Government should invest in constructi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16862745098 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76113855292 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.218845776 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170024488124 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563578967231 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461593546392 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117212108509 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479241945585 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.