Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
There is a view that applying a surge in the price of petrol can help in mitigating the traffic and pollution-related concerns. I perceive that this can certainly be one of the effective measures; however, getting rid of such issues should be taken as a multi-pronged approach and requires not only government, but also individuals to participate equally.
To begin with, admittedly, increase in petrol cost can solve traffic and pollution problems, as with a rise in the expenditure on petrol, people may start avoiding using their vehicles as much as possible. With a lesser number of cars on roads, a significant fall may be recorded in the level of sound and air pollution. For instance, in India, owing to the sky-rocketing fuel prices, most individuals now prefer taking public transport over their own vehicles, and it has proven to be a successful measure in many Southern cities. Nevertheless, prices can only be raised deliberately up to a certain extent and hence, there are chances of failure in implementing this measure alone.
Coming to other methodologies that can be used to decrease the traffic and pollution level, one is the implementation of stringent rules by the government. Fear of law is important to enforce good conduct among people, therefore, such regulations, if implemented, may help in making people aware as well as responsible towards these world-wide problems. To illustrate, the Delhi government applied odd-even vehicle rule, as a result of which they witnessed a shocking improvement in the quality of air, as the citizens also followed the rule responsibly. Additionally, individuals can also contribute by using public transport and by travelling in groups using carpools. Above-mentioned ways can definitely result in decreased traffic and pollution level.
To conclude, a hike in the petrol prices can surely aid in dropping the rush on the roads, in turn, reducing the air and sound pollution level. Although I opine such an approach should collaborate with other equally crucial methods which involves government to implement strict rules and people to follow them diligently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28908554572 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13284335624 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6298226028 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.923076923 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158447930615 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601753618821 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452189868877 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978762607985 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323591867608 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.