Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the safety of environment is a big controversial issue. It is often argued that just government and big companies can assist to improve the environment than compared to individual’s efforts. I completely disagree with this opinion and think that individuals can better improve the environment than authorities and big industries.
First of all, I believe that individual can make our environment better by making litter changes than government and industries. Even if the authorities have the power to make the rules for individuals, but it obeys by individuals. Therefore, if they refuse to obey rules such as save water then how government can make changes our surroundings. To exemplify this, the president of India Mr. Narinder Modi recently picks the litter from beach to keep it intact. He set an example for public that every person has to put efforts to clean our environment. As a result, if individual make litter then it will make big contribution to save our environment.
Secondly, each person has his responsibilities to save environment and these changes makes big differences. For instance, according to the survey of Cambridge University, if all over the world, every person save one litter water daily, then we can save million letter of water each day. Consequently, it has been proved that individual can improve issues of environment than governments and large companies. Therefore, government always pass rules to protect environment for to obey by individuals.
In conclusion, I believe that although big companies and government has power, it doesn’t mean that only they can improve the environment. The situation of environment can be improved by individual’s efforts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... As a result, if individual make litter then it will make big contribution to save o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ne litter water daily, then we can save million letter of water each day. Consequently,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43333333333 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2941399522 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1917245541 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.8 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285043420503 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112579993815 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878122125246 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20159318942 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559393736176 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.