It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
The debate between inherent talent versus acquired once is never ending. As a result, certain section of the society claims that talent is God gifted and is bestowed to a child when born. Whereas, others have contrasting views in support of hard-work and dedication in acquiring them. In my opinion, albeit the fact that genes does play a part, but talent is predominantly a result of one’s own efforts.
Firstly, one of the most significant reasons behind certain people favoring the by-birth talent is the fact that medical science have results in favor of this claim. For instance, research has proved that children born from intelligent parents does have higher IQ levels, when compared to lower ones’. Furthermore, the classic example of the greatest scientist of all time, Albert Einstien who was said to be born intelligent with extremely high IQ when compared to normal person.
On the other hand, other people puts strong conviction on humanly qualities of dedication, hard-work and perseverance. Furthermore, an individual who practice a lot and is passionate towards a field can prosper in his field of interest. Whereas, a genetically advanced individual lacking passion does not produce significant achievements. For instance, David Beckham, one of the best footballers of all time who have achieved enormous success in his field, has initially faced numerous challenges in early stages of his career. Moreover, He claimed that his perfection on the field was an outcome of his hard-work and passion toward it.
To conclude, it is undeniable fact that genes does favor certain class of people. However, positive human qualities such as hard-work and dedication are key to success and once a person practices them religiously, will lead to mastering any skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d can prosper in his field of interest. Whereas, a genetically advanced individual lack...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29473684211 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.849935067 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7169311161 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.785714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133668932134 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043339413395 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339469020714 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775835497045 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225960742804 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.