It is important to construct common area such as parks, playgrounds and squares in all town and cities. Do you agree or disagree?
The topic of building rest and recreation places in natural state has been in the headlines for decades. Some feel that building grounds or parks in every town is not important.However, I agree with those who say that building common places will be beneficial. In this essay, I will examine both sides and give my opinion.
Regarding those who feel construction of natural state is not important, there are many reasons. The most common one is the shortage of land area. For example now a days people start building multi stories building. Secondly people point out that civic bodies don't maintain land area, which eventually turn out to be waste land. Stanford published a study in 2015 that found averagely 70% parks in Asia are not well maintained and they are not productive enough that they can save mother land and causes more natural clematises.
Nevertheless, I firmly believe that opinion is ludicrous. The obvious reason is that building common areas such as parks & squares help us in maintain mother land and delay many natural clematises. For instance the University of Oregon published a study that said that with every single park Asia is able to reduce 25% of Co2 release out of cars. This same study suggest that if 50% more parks get constructed then Asia will be able to reduce 100% Co2 emitted by gasoline enabled vehicles.
In sum, if everyone pitches in, like civic bodies, normal people like you and me can, indeed construct more parks. I hope that, soon everyone of us does our part to get parks and playground constructed in their areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... building grounds or parks in every town is not important.However, I agree with t...
^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...r parks in every town is not important.However, I agree with those who say that buildi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...examine both sides and give my opinion. Regarding those who feel construction of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... the shortage of land area. For example now a days people start building multi stories bui...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ndly people point out that civic bodies dont maintain land area, which eventually tu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...land. Stanford published a study in 2015 that found averagely 70% parks in Asia a...
^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and and causes more natural clematises. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that opin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... playground constructed in their areas.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86194029851 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53830128726 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.85982439 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13795536918 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451595380869 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494651376821 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804267805657 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253057847616 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.