It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Exploring different parts of world has always been an imports aspect in terms of scientists as well as governments. Travelling to extreme ends of the earth for experts and travelers is feasible in today’s world like South Pole. In my opinion, this step explore the opportunities of a better life in many ways and has a wide variety of advantages to human kind.
Firstly, travelling to remote areas where humans have never lived before expand the possibilities of living there. With the increase in population around the world, the earth is getting smaller and smaller every day, therefore the demand of more land is high to provide the habitat for the growing population. For instance, urban regions of Mumbai, India, are getting polluted and constrain with the rise in number of residence each year. Hence, allocation of these people to another land is the big reason to worry for the government.
Secondly, possibilities of natural resources are high in remote areas like South Pole because of zero habitat on such lands, therefore travelling to such places is a major relief for scientific community in terms of providing better utilities to the people. For instance, recently it has been revealed by geological experts that extreme poles of earth carry ample amount of freshwater, and this can benefits humans in terms of providing drinking water for 100 years. However, extreme environmental conditions of such regions can make living possibilities difficult, as humans acceptable range of living is in moderate temperature zone.
In conclusion, the hot and cold temperature can be challenge for humans to survive on remote regions. Although, the benefits mentioned above outweigh the disadvantages of travelling to remote regions of the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'imports'' or 'import's'?
Suggestion: imports'; import's
...erent parts of world has always been an imports aspect in terms of scientists as well a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...le to another land is the big reason to worry for the government. Secondly, possibilit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...mple amount of freshwater, and this can benefits humans in terms of providing drinking w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or humans to survive on remote regions. Although, the benefits mentioned above outweigh ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lling to remote regions of the world.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27659574468 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86655577215 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3873261643 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293858175432 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960309504985 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660571243842 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167049833524 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546517192942 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.