It is often said that the government spends too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important.
Do you agree or disagree?
In recent times, the flora and fauna has been badly affected due to human activities and industrial development. Some people opine that the investment in preserving wildlife by the governments should be redirected to deal with other social causes that are persisting in the world. I, however, have an opposing perspective that the money spent on the protection of plants and animals to ensure a sustainable life on earth is beneficial for mankind.
To begin with, the destruction of forests has led to a plethora of environmental problems. This is because a vast array of plants and vegetation are vital for the food chain. Besides, biodiversity is imperative for the natural sustainability of the ecosystem. The cutting of forests, for example, is the major reason for issues such as land degradation, soil erosion, climate change, and an increase of carbon content in the air. The direct and indirect effects of these problems are responsible for several social challenges faced by humans. For instance, due to alleviated supply of food and ameliorated diseases, many countries are in debt and fighting with economic as well as social challenges. Therefore, it is far better to spend money on preserving plants than facing poverty because of the repercussions of not saving it.
Furthermore, just as much as plants, wild animals are also important for the ecosystem. The protection of endangered species by establishing wildlife sanctuaries and natural parks would be advantageous in creating employment opportunities for people. To exemplify, a recent report by the Economic Times shows that conservation parks and wildlife reserves offer employment to some sections of the society. Moreover, the local wildlife could also be a tourist attraction, thus benefiting the tourism industry.
Having seen the above points, it can be concluded that conserving Mother Nature is equally important for humankind as it provides various merits concerning the economic and social aspects of any country. So, the funding by the government for environmental causes is definitely required.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-01 | JK82 | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | jessie_12345 | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | Birjees Fatima | 78 | view |
- It is often said that the government spends too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts below shows the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 19821 to 2007 61
- Many small local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with the large supermarkets in the area How does this effect local communities How could this situation be improved 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in 6 countries 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41717791411 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06138042942 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0983513423 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104312862465 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329335890027 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030604187223 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653050737625 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284531126973 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41717791411 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06138042942 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0983513423 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104312862465 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329335890027 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030604187223 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653050737625 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284531126973 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.