It is often said that we should work to live, not live to work. Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.
It is without doubt that improving quality of life is the most important goal of everyone. With this regard, some people believe that our end goal should be living, and we have to only work to maintain a good life; however, others think that the whole purpose of living is working. In this essay, I will investigate these two opinions.
Let's start with the belief that the ultimate goal of living is working. Supporters of this side of the coin believe in dedication. They suggest that one can achieve a high quality of life only and if only dedicates herself to a carrier, path or a cause. There are numerous examples of this way of living, such as Einstein and Gandhi. These individuals incorporating their extraordinary talent, dedicated their life to their paths, thus creating a better world for themselves, people around them, and coming after them.
In contrast to the previous perspective, most of the people think that our ultimate goal should be enjoying life, and working is just a mean to that. These people think that either working hard or not, at the end of the day, we are going to die, so why not enjoying the moments that we have? This recipe works for majority of the society, owing to the fact that only a small number of people are capable of dedicating their life for a worthy path in life, and most of the people are just average Joe. Therefore, for this high number of people, dedication is just a pure waste of time and energy which at the end not only doesn't approach to any positive outcome, but also affect the person herself in a destructive way leading to a variety of illnesses such as depression and anxiety.
To summarize, I believe that for most of the people it is better to work as little and enjoy life as much as possible. This way, they don't need to gamble their whole life on a life-long carrier, to find out they lack the necessary talent or dedication at the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...will investigate these two opinions. Lets start with the belief that the ultimate...
^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he society, owing to the fact that only a small number of people are capable of dedicating their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...me and energy which at the end not only doesnt approach to any positive outcome, but a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 699, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a destructive way" with adverb for "destructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ome, but also affect the person herself in a destructive way leading to a variety of illnesses such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ife as much as possible. This way, they dont need to gamble their whole life on a li...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5726744186 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43857579469 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7039122563 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100160633611 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040228041744 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521410603863 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068139196784 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367742091673 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.