jghtfgiulk'k' uigiuhj
Some people think there should be some competative spirit in children whereas some think that children who were taught to co-operate will become more usefull adults rather than who compete. Further, i would account that both has their own pros and cons which can be viewed in the following essay.
A sense of competitive spirit must be encouraged in children which leads to their success in future.When they induce racing spirit in their studies or games they definitely work on it to be first in everything which leads to many achievements in their life inspite it also brings success.At the same time children should be thought where to have competition and where to not be.For example,Being ruthless encourage one to enter into different sports feilds which brings them many medals by playing in different sectors which indirectly helps our nation.
However children should also be encouraged to work together with others which helps them to develop group working in different fields. For example,if a group of children has given a project to do together there they should know how to work simultaniously by discussing each and every point.Here they should not be compitative which indeed lead to failure of a work or leaving in between.And also if at all it comes to sports like football or kabaddi one should know how to play together there they must have coordination between them which lead them to winning.
To recapitulate, every children must be taught both being competative and at the same time being co-operate to each other. The children who knows the difference between them and who can apply them based on their situation they can become a more usefull adults for the companies or in dustried in their furture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... become more usefull adults rather than who compete. Further, i would account that ...
^^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...dults rather than who compete. Further, i would account that both has their own p...
^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n children which leads to their success in future.When they induce racing spirit in their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
... which leads to their success in future.When they induce racing spirit in their stud...
^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...eir life inspite it also brings success.At the same time children should be though...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...to have competition and where to not be.For example,Being ruthless encourage one to...
^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Being
...petition and where to not be.For example,Being ruthless encourage one to enter into di...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rs which indirectly helps our nation. However children should also be encouraged to w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...working in different fields. For example,if a group of children has given a project...
^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Here
...usly by discussing each and every point.Here they should not be compitative which in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...failure of a work or leaving in between.And also if at all it comes to sports like ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00692041522 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64225314046 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498269896194 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 20.2975951904 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 160.755105927 49.4020404114 325% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 206.714285714 106.682146367 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.2857142857 20.7667163134 199% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.0946893788 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.1190380762 182% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.