Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that managerial roles are performed by elder candidates in companies. It is argued by some individuals that fresh leader can be a more appropriate candidate for leadership. I do not agree and believe that young individuals lacks many features to be on top management position.
To begin with, experience is the vital requirement in a leader which a young individual lacks therefore aged person is more suited on leadership position. Years of learnings and practice teaches an individual how to face difficult situation and make important decisions for the sake of everyone and these skills are deficient in younger leader which may organization finds risky, thus employers prefer to have older candidate for leadership position. For instance, old employees are paid high salary as compared with new one because of their years of work which makes them competent and strong candidate for the organization.
Similarly, aged candidate are more respected thus, it becomes easy for the organization to continue smooth operation. Older people are valued and staff often listen to their advice and accept their ideas without cross questioning which creates a hustle free environment at work stations rather than providing opportunity to younger leader who can be questioned on his decisions by experienced candidate, therefore the administrative control of elder candidate is more suitable for any organization to conduct operations efficiently.
In conclusion, I disagree that young talent can be a better candidate for leadership because the elder employees receive honor from the younger staff and skills acquire by seniors while working for many years which overall make them more competent candidate for directors role.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... strong candidate for the organization. Similarly, aged candidate are more respe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46840148699 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9633686236 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.22524403 49.4020404114 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.444444444 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8888888889 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175252884553 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756994001064 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523779124521 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113890957493 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230567189735 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.