The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is quite common these days for the elderly to become managers of corporations. The phenomenon is not restricted to multinational companies which find experienced employees more productive, but is also evident among a lot of startups that tend to employ older people to lead their business.
The reason for this phenomenon may involve the recognition that a young adult who directly graduate from university and who just have less five years’ working experience is rather restricted in terms of general knowledge and experience of the companies. By contrast, older people who have spent plenty of years working in a particular area, have a broader view of life and abound with personal resources to draw on. They tend to be more confident and wise, which is a vital factor of governing organizations, as well as giving them an advantage in terms of coping with the challenges and crisis of organization’s development.
However, some people argue that our society should provide young people with opportunities of leading an organization. As we move towards an information society, young people with the skills of exploiting the internet and the knowledge of big data and AI are more likely to capture new business chances. They are probably aware of thinking whatever their users want, regardless of earning money at first, and of developing satisfactory products their users please. Another advantage of young leaders is that they become expert at utilizing tools based on the new technology. Some enterprisers in my country have become stars and celebrities as a result of using constantly new messaging service such as Whatsapp, owned by Facebook. He or she frequently shows their fans the products of his or her company in order to forward the sale of products. Besides, young managers also encourage employees to maximize efficiency of working via new tools mentioned above.
So overall, I believe that, older people care for second thoughts before making big decisions, which plays midwife to an organization’s success. There is no doubt that the elderly as a leader of whole company benefits more than young people from this respect. Of course, it is better for older managers to learn how to use new technological tools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, no doubt, of course, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20054945055 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00979938599 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0834210526 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190410655472 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618445951043 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523051045475 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11323576763 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413840444289 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.