Learning to play team sports is an important part of a child’s education.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Educating children with different outdoor activities has become increasingly popular among many people. One of the most famous types of activity is a group activity, which is widely used by public schools and kindergartens. However, I strongly believe that group sports or team building activities are greatly helpful for children to learn faster and efficiently. In this essay, I will discuss how taking part in group sports help children to learn faster and more effectively and efficiently.
To begin with, children learn at a fast speed when they perform in front of other competitors. Because of the competition between them, they do things faster to beat them. This way, they become faster while doing different kinds of activities. At schools, for instance, children take part in many sports activities on sports day, which help them to learn and become faster while competing with other children.
Another important point which could be made in favor of group play is children learn to play sports more effectively because they know that they have to complete the task accurately. If they fail to do this, then they will lose the game. Moreover, every child has a unique ability to perform and different idea to complete a task. So, other children learn new ways to perform better by watching them. For example, children learn to do the same thing by applying different techniques which they learned from other fellow children.
Last but not least, playing in groups could lead to achieving a goal more efficiently. When they perform in a team of more than two, they learn to perform more efficiently, which could help them to achieve career goals in their upcoming future. In addition, team-building activities are very helpful to complete a task more accurately by applying different thoughts. Every individual has different thoughts and unique ability to perform a task. To illustrate, many big projects have been successfully completed by a group of people in the past few years.
To sum up, there are many things which could be achieved by doing an activity in a group such as doing things faster, learning effectively, and efficiently. So, it has been seen in the past that the group or team-building activities are widely performed in schools and universities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10133333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72993740262 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.742481201 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.65 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120299332817 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434015508346 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367770680118 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790825118959 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261644929845 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.