Mainly museums and historical sites are visited by tourist not local people. Why is the case? How can it be solved?
Historical places are enriched with magnificent evolutionary of mankind. However, the wealthier and healthier the history is, local people do not find it curious to visit such places whereas these places are frequently visited by tourists. There are many reasons behind this behaviour of local people but that can be solved by little efforts.
Firstly, these historical places enlighten our rich tradition and culture and thus it can be saved. But the lack of connection between history and real life steps all of us backward. Even in our education system, history is not being correlated and emphasized with practical exposure as much as other subjects such as Maths, Science and so on.
Secondly, local people are not very curious to explore such places as it is not important and extraordinary for their routine life. They find them as an as usual place due to lack of real knowledge and motivation. In addition, entry fee is levied for these kinds of places to visit which discourage people at some extent.
To overcome this situation, local people should be encouraged by arranging campaign, relating these places with our tradition and culture and so on. For children, school tours ought to be arranged so they can connect it with study and real life. Entry to these places should be arranged at affordable or free of cost for local people to allure them on some special occasions or days.
To conclude, as historical places such as forts, museums and so on depict the sacrificial of our freedom fighters for our betterment, they should be preserved and the knowledge of the same should be passed on to our next generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, as for, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96363636364 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62290987233 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9820383568 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162571479172 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668340824356 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490081022423 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101365695342 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464591297253 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.