Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?
Immunization is considered as a preventive measure for various types of childhood illnesses. There are 2 arguments as to whether the authority should force the society to have their child vaccinated or the citizens would be given their rights for refusal. In my own view, the role of the government is to oblige the primary care givers of today’s young generation to cooperate in the implementation of vaccination rather than giving them an option to refuse.
On the one hand, the health sector should impose strict compliance regarding the issue in vaccination due to the fact that the dreaded childhood illnesses are becoming more epidemic, whereas giving parents an option to refuse greatly affects the efficacy of the program. Moreover, for several decades now, common childhood diseases such as Polio, Hepatitis B, Tuberculosis, Varicella, Diphtheria, and Pertussis are only a few that have been managed globally through the administration of several shots from birth. However, the possibility of success in totally solving the issue is being altered by some significant number of morbidity and mortality cases. For example, the Department of Health consolidated its data during the measles outbreak in 2019 with an alarming result of 20% more hospital cases among all the regions, particularly in the rural areas where parents can effortlessly refuse to vaccines. Therefore, it is indeed vital for every country’s health sector to improve its plan of action in the eradication of these life-threatening illnesses through a more aggressive approach during the execution of the program.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that every medical action taken could have a potential adverse effect making other citizens become hesitant and will go against even with the law. In relation to this, every human body has the ability to differently react to vaccines, which are mostly derived from an attenuated organism, the possibility of its untoward effect is definitely present. For instance, the Philippine Government previously released a vaccine called Dengvaxia and made its way to an enormous number of children who received the medication, but instead of serving its purpose of fighting Dengue, it made an allergic crisis to the children leading to hospitalization.
In conclusion, the authority has the supreme power to effectively educate and mandate the citizens with regards to the health improvement of the youth and has several benefits which greatly outweigh the drawback. Furthermore, I stand with the truth that the country's governing body should command its citizens as the lives of these little individuals depend on how their elders cooperate and abide effectively with the action taken by the law.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ldhood illnesses. There are 2 arguments as to whether the authority should force the society ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'measles'' or 'measle's'?
Suggestion: measles'; measle's
...Health consolidated its data during the measles outbreak in 2019 with an alarming resul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3511627907 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92227509404 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572093023256 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0958379466 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.0 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0769230769 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210134188096 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650497932581 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631811512623 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114459831068 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419946721995 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.