In many countries, most shops and products become identical. Some people think it as a positive development, while others believe it as a negative development. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today's era of globalisation, similar products are easily available across the globe due to international trade. While some people consider it a benefit for the country, others take it as a negative approach. In this essay, I shall discuss both viewpoints in the forthcoming paragraphs, followed by my own opinion.
To embark upon, having identical items in the country has umpteen advantages. One of the major factors could be cheaper products, as the similarity among these increases the level of competition between the business owners. Moreover, to hold a position in the market, it becomes necessary for some shopkeepers to challenge their opponents' products in terms of price. In addition, the equivalency of goods not only elevates reachability but also aids in affordability for consumers. A perfect example would be wearable clothes, which start at Rs. 100 and can go beyond millions. Furthermore, variety in consumable stocks can give a sense of improved quality or features. A recent survey by the University of California states that there are over half a million unique designs for just a water bottle.
On the contrary, a section of society believes that having the same kind of products is not healthy for the business, as it would be troublesome for peers to grab sales. Additionally, there are organisations that have monopolies in the country. Due to this, they sell their stocks at a non-justified value. Airlines, for instance, were once owned by a single organisation and were overcharging their customers.
To conclude, in my perspective, it is undoubtedly beneficial to have common products, as these are inexpensive and have a broader reach in society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22878228782 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10740984898 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649446494465 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6141107507 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142686558896 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423879181732 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552377674208 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079495421692 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752706642287 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.