In many countries, people are spending more time in their workplace.
Why is this?
Is this a negative or positive development?
In this competitive decade, people engaging themselves in work for a longer period of time these days. This chiefly due to the evolving nature of human beings in the 21st century and it is not a positive change according to me.
Today, the younger generation faces financial deficiency due to the minimum wages. Therefore, people are avoiding traditional 9 to 5 job, instead of they prefer to work 10 hours daily to fulfill their requirements. In past, the majority of the people were unable to purchase basic amenities from their salary. Additionally, the plunging ratio of salary and expenses forced individuals to become workaholic. Hence, living expenses are hiked with increasing years compared to their compensation. For example, according to the report of Times of India, daily tariff surged by 10 times, as average livelihood stable on the same level in the last 5 years in India.
However, spending excessive time in the workplace has too many downsides. First and foremost, it induces mental or physical health problems depending on the workplace. IT job-related employees suffering from stress and anxiety, on the flip side, physical activities cause chronic organ damage. Moreover, spending less time with their family is a critical problem in the fast pace of life. A person forgets about the personal balanced life in the crave of earning more incentives. Ultimately, its reasons for the break of personal relationships in such cases.
In conclusion, many people work too much to get high remuneration as they can support their family’s financial needs. Although, Personal balanced life and health issues are enough reasons to cut their working hours and live happily with a family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-04 | rahipatel3011 | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | rahipatel3011 | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | rahipatel3011 | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 76
- The gap between rich and poor is growing What problems does this create What can be done to tackle them 91
- The chart below give information about the amount and type of water in the world and also tell the use of water in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The gap between rich and poor is growing. What problems does this create? What can be done to tackle them? 78
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ngaging themselves in work for a longer period of time these days. This chiefly due to the evo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to the evolving nature of human beings in the 21st century and it is not a posi...
^^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'job' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'jobs'.
Suggestion: jobs
... people are avoiding traditional 9 to 5 job, instead of they prefer to work 10 hour...
^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...rs daily to fulfill their requirements. In past, the majority of the people were unable...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ets about the personal balanced life in the crave of earning more incentives. Ultimately,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22262773723 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78167319998 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.907291644 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4375 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232142396354 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640737261123 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647691194922 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128141754524 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459092434244 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.