Consumption of plastic products has been increased a lot in last few decades. Most of the countries produce plastic waste on a large scale, as demand for packed food products as well as energy drinks is rising upwardly. I believe, there are more negative sides to this, which includes environmental damage resulting in difficult survival of many living creature on earth.
Increasing use of plastic products across the globe have affected our entire planet negatively. One reason is, as this material is usually non-degradable it ends piling up wherever it is discarded. A lot of companies involved in food production makes use of plastic containers, bags and wrappers. As these waste cannot be recycled, managing it is difficult and this results in improper disposal affecting different living organisms. Majority of marine life is affected by, as plastic floats on the surface on the water, it often intertwines with the body of aquatic creature and suffocating them.
On the other hand, the reason that the plastic is used to such an extent is due to its cost efficiency. Plastic is cheap, and offers more profit to the companies, also makes the products affordable for the consumers. However, the problems faced due to its overuse surely needs to be managed. There are many countries promoting use of paper bags instead of plastics. Another thing one can do is changing the quality of plastic that can be eco friendly. For instance, in India, government have put a ban on the use of plastic, so some companies have been successful in producing a degradable quality of plastic, and thus this helps in lowering the amount of plastic waste.
In conclusion, use of plastics cannot be totally banned as it is cheap, however by replacing few packaging style and changing the quality of plastic where it can be recycled or made eco friendly, can definitely help reduce its production and will also help in managing our surrounding better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun packaging seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little packaging'.
Suggestion: little packaging
...ed as it is cheap, however by replacing few packaging style and changing the quality of plast...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, well, another thing, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02167182663 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7680858139 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560371517028 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2853516951 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207447039133 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071893424077 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548787131794 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124798253535 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559472510252 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.