In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land and in the water, so people think they should be banned.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Plastic bags are considered as the major contributor in the world’s litter. It is believed that a complete restriction on the usage of plastic bags assists curtailing water and land pollution. I strongly believe imposing strict ban aids in pollution reduction at water as well as land.
To begin with, Plastic bags have a major contribution in land pollution due to its biodegradable nature. This is because it takes thousands of years to get it demolished completely. Nowadays every household items are wrapped in plastic bags. Consequently, more supply and longer time to recycle leads to incline in rubbish at land. For instance, a news report last month revealed that 70% increase in the usage of plastic bags has been observed in INDIA since 2010, which contributes to 60% of the total rubbish. Thus, imposing a complete ban on the usage of plastic is the major way in litter reduction.
Furthermore, Water bodies are majorly impacted by the plastic waste because plastic broken into small pieces are carried to oceans by the natural agents such as rain or wind. This will not only impact the marine life but also elevates the sea levels. Most of the marine life ingest plastic substances and this will eventually lead to their deaths. As a result, its deadly bodies contributes more water pollution. Moreover, the occurrence of plastic in water bodies raise the temperature of water bodies, consequently, assist in melting more glaciers. For example, A recent survey in the Guardian states that rate of melting the glaciers have reported 30% higher in 2017 as compared to 2014. Therefore, increased global warming and climate change are observed in last decade.
To recapitulate, increase in the usage of plastic bags have resulted in more land pollution due to its non-biodegradable factor and also costs the extinction of marine life and assisting global warming as a result of water pollution. I reckon, imposing a strict ban on the plastic bags is the only effective solution to alleviate the pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07207207207 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81193671144 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51951951952 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5957147916 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05555555556 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166739493464 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567285272228 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415264697291 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120806449125 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031997034158 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.