In many countries, senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that nowadays, top-level management is getting the high package rather than the junior level. But there are some other counterparts who believe that who is effectively doing their work, they have to get more package. I am of the opinion, individuals who are all in a higher position, they have a plethora of responsibilities and they are doing a vital role in their work.
First and foremost, top-level management certainly places a commanding role and motivate the employees very hard to achieve their respective goals. This is not only for their own goal that include the company growth as well. Secondly, higher salary also attracts and retains globally recruit the top management talent. This really helps to identify those talented people. If they don't pay high salaries, top executives will look for the other option where they can get a good salary and they can contribute the company as well.
Furthermore, the job of a top official is mostly invisible to the ordinary workers. They have a plenty of responsibilities within the company management. They are always communicating with stakeholders to make them happy always. Their responsibilities to do new analysis and analytics for the company margin, to build the architect for the new products without impact anything, to hire new employees who are all thinking innovatively, this is not an easiest job as younger people can manage this work. Ordinary responsibilities up to their production hours only after that they will not do anything but top-level management does not have any scheduled time.
To summarize this topic, top officials are highly responsible for the company growth in order to this they have to be motivated and highly paid with the increment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...identify those talented people. If they dont pay high salaries, top executives will ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ng with stakeholders to make them happy always. Their responsibilities to do new analy...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... all thinking innovatively, this is not an easiest job as younger people can manag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17543859649 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95394004219 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1600639327 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.357142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110862459795 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432520594768 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332393794172 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749079199945 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00727394409184 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.