In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happen? What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society?
In the past, members of family always had meals together because they believe that eating foods together is family tradition. Nowadays, this tradition is vanishing due to different work schedules of each member. As a result, this habit will cause isolation to family members and community as well. In the following passage, the factors influencing this change as well as the negative impacts will be explained briefly.
In current time, all the family members are working on different schedules of time. In addition, children spending good amount of time on browsing the internet and playing games. Thus, family members are not having meals together and take meals once they are free. For example, My friend's father is working on morning shift and his mother is working on night shift because of these different work schedules, they take meals whenever they get time.
There are many negative effects of this trend as well. Firstly, bonding between family members will disappear slowly and that lead to isolation. In today's world, social interaction with family members and to the community people are really important. For instance, my other neighbor’s son spent less time with their parents, because of this, when he faced tough situations, he could not able to share with anyone and he committed suicide. Their parents did not aware about his situations. Hence, these factors are becoming a threat to the family.
In conclusion, having meals with family is really important but, due to different schedules of each member they take meal not together. Family members should take meals together and parents should teach their child importance of having meals together. This is will help not child to become a better person but also important for society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...working on different schedules of time. In addition, children spending good amount...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, hence, if, really, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46309996959 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7343003133 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3529411765 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290446494042 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103272113911 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797361392253 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187619407368 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684087813069 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.