In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.
What do you think are the causes of this?
What solutions can you suggest?
In Kazakhstan, the awareness of events plays an important role in making daily decisions. However, some social workers claim that a small number of people are interested in keeping track of news through newspapers or TV. In this essay, I will consider the reasons for this low interest in the community and suggest some possible steps to deal with it.
Let us start with the reasons why these types of media have a tiny audience. The first reason is that people are inclined to monitor the news online. Many people prefer to learn about public affairs on the Internet, since it allows them to access news immediately, which newspapers and TV programs usually cannot offer. Another cause is that people tend to be suspicious of news presented on newspapers and TV channels. Most people distrust information on newspapers as well as TV, because they tend to provide false information to attract greater attention.
Nevertheless, some editors state that it is possible to handle this problem by taking the following actions. Firstly, they advise publishing issues more frequently. The way forward would be for both newspaper and TV companies to produce their news more often, so that they could compete with rivals in the web. Secondly, they recommend introducing a law against distorted information. To address this problem, the government should impose regulations against misleading information, so that newspapers and TV channels would stop generating unreliable news.
In conclusion, although there are many factors contributing to the inconsiderable interest in following news on newspapers and TV, I think that it is probable to solve this complication by adopting the above mentioned measures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...However, some social workers claim that a small number of people are interested in keeping track ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[1]
Message: Verbs 'advise' and 'remind' are used with infinitive: 'to publish'.
Suggestion: to publish
...following actions. Firstly, they advise publishing issues more frequently. The way forward...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32472324723 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87238976273 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1517019387 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23997940305 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776491660748 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608099719436 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146760143505 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373307300499 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.