Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.
To what extent do you agree?
During last century, women have become essential part of workforce in society, with more than half of the employee in developing countries. However, commentators state that the gender-gap still existed at managerial role. As far as I concerned, gender-gap at top-level existed and companies should tackle this issue immediately, due to the following reasons.
First of all, by assigning women at top-level, firms could get benefit from diversified skill provided by female. It is an undeniable fact that each gender has different skills and by reducing gender-gap, firm could use another perspective, that could be neglected by only male managers. Furthermore, by putting ceiling in women career progress, they become less motivated. While differences between man and woman in academic or professional skills is insignificant nowadays, low ratio of women in top manager signals that achieving managerial position is impossible for women, leading to decrease in employee morale. Finally, gender-gap is not efficient for companies. High percentage of men in top position, despite the same ratio in workforce, implied that less-talented men get top-position. This inefficient method for companies could be stopped by assigning job only based on the merit of applicant, not gender.
Admittedly, opponents might mention that women do not have enough experience at top level and board members do not want to risk by assigning top-level job to less-experience applicant; however, this logic is faulty and unfair since women with the same-level of skill and education as man, deserve a chance to prove themselves.
In conclusion, while companies tend to assign only men to top-level position due to concern about in-earpiece of women at top-level job, this practice should be stopped since it is not practical and efficient for firms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 919, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the merit of applicant, not gender. Admittedly, opponents might mention that...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50883392226 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0368182741 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6335492032 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.916666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173673919949 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063267029178 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452452936441 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117051724795 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279851280264 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.