Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. Do you agree?

In last few decade, women have contributes a lot in work in all the fields. Women have proved that, they can work equally in competition with men. Like said above, in many developed countries, there are more women workers than men, so this situation can help in explaining, that women should be given equal rights to work at a high level position. Though, most of high position are filled by men. In this assay we will discuss this in detail, and conclude what could be a solution for the same.

Women have proves themselves as a champion in so many field. They can manage their home as well as their work responsibly. There a number of women, who have break the ice in the field of astronomy, sports, research and many more, for e.g, Ms. Kalpana Chawla, Indian astronomer, who have made the country as well as whole world proud. Another name is Ms. Sania Mirza, a tennis player, who have won so many gold medals for her country, and the list goes on. Given the equal right to work in a top position, it is assured to get success for the same, but this opportunity for women are very less.

Most of the companies are more centered towards hiring of male candidates for higher position. This glass needs to be broken down. Now, companies should consider hiring women for top positions too. The companies should design a recruitment plan by dividing total number of position and then allocating them equally for male and females.

This plan may help to bring out the hidden opportunities for women, and also fulfill the dreams that a women have.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun decade seems to be countable; consider using: 'few decades'.
Suggestion: few decades
In last few decade, women have contributes a lot in work i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ights to work at a high level position. Though, most of high position are filled by me...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fields'.
Suggestion: many fields
...e proves themselves as a champion in so many field. They can manage their home as well as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...women, and also fulfill the dreams that a women have.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...men, and also fulfill the dreams that a women have.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, then, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64130434783 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34758844297 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5179396078 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230544030439 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929328231421 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966704407663 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140772662798 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871873601173 0.056905535591 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.