Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. Do you agree?

Essay topics:

Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. Do you agree?

It is conspicuous that most of the companies executive board are occupied by men, eventhough equal number of women's are employed. It is unfortunate that job's are denied based on sex. Therefore, it is agreed that frames should allocate certain number of executive job to women. This thesis will be supported by analysing avoiding sex discrimination and women's smartness.

Females should be given bigger share of jobs because women currently outperform males in most university subjects. That is to say those young women are just as qualified as men, if not more, and should therefore be given an equal share in the job market. For example, in 2014 it was reported in Times of India that only 9 of India's top 100 companies have female CEOs, despite making up 40% of the total workforce. This clearly shows despite women's smartness job's are denied.

Women should be allocated a certain percentage of roles, because to not do so discriminates against them because of their gender. As result women will be be denied jobs, not because of intellect or skill, simply because of their sex. For example, as per the report published by women entrepreneur magazine last year 80% top executive jobs were denied to women. Thus, this clearly proves the discrimination based on sex.

In summary. jobs intolerance against women's based on gender is prevalent across industry. Therefore, It is clear that companies should reserve some percentage of high-level jobs for women to avoid sex discrimination. It is predicated that companies will realise the potential of women power and allocate the jobs to them in executive board in foreseeable future.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...e of their gender. As result women will be be denied jobs, not because of intellect o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Jobs
...imination based on sex. In summary. jobs intolerance against women's based ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in summary, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23703703704 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94564382747 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.561755894193 94% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.452690088 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203345639796 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757939832236 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060765887596 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140785471907 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196947526663 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.