Nowadays, several museums are charging entry fees to the visitors for compelling reasons whereas few museums do not take a penny as any kind of entrance charge. I am undecided whether it would be beneficial or not, and will, therefore, examine both the pros and cons in the essay.
Admittedly, it could be advantageous to charge some admission money. First and foremost, from the maintenance perspective, it is important to preserve the beauty of the museum and to do so, it is very essential to get a minimal amount of fees from the visitors. Another significant argument in favor is that museums can upgrade their infrastructure if they have different sources of earning. Thus, the entry fee is one of the ubiquitous ways to charge the visitors. A final issue worthy of consideration relates to the idea that those museums who charge fees during admission to visitors are not only providing better facilities to them, but it also enhances the way on how items are showcased.
Despite these advantages, imposing some entry fees on the viewers could pose some problems. Firstly, it would not be easy for everyone to visit the museum if they get charged for entry. Moreover, during leisure time, only middle-class people can entertain themselves as they could afford the entry fee. Therefore, it would result in the drastic decline in the number of people who visit the museum. Secondly, inside the museum, people usually apprise their children about their ancestors and their sacrifices. However, if they get charged to spend their quality time with their family and to teach them real values of life, they will reduce their visits at the museum to avoid the extra cost.
Despite having considered both sides of this issue, I think that its pros overweigh the cons. Museum has its value only if visitors visit and it is not a good option to charge them. However, the museum committee needs to find some other ways to get the money which could be used for the betterment of the museum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92668621701 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59199384143 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533724340176 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7116293612 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257397757827 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896848492713 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741389020984 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170442914211 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249297226626 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.