Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
A plethora of criminals who spent sometime in a jail as a kind of punishment for the first time, might commit more crimes afterward. This due to several factors such as mix all prisoners together and sharing some risky stories. This essay aims to explore in further detail the reasons of such an issue and offers some solutions to overcome it before coming to a conclusion.
To begin with, it’s irrefutable that blending prisoners all together might exacerbate their attitudes and lead them to become more aggressive in the future. For instance, offenders who had small crimes such as thefts, or dangerous driving can easily being influenced by other dangerous prisoners who have been accused of murdering or drug trading. Since it gives them the opportunities to hear and learn new bad experience that has made by other prisoners. Brazil has a live example of very bad prison environment. Since every single jail has some dangerous gangs who have been accused of drug trading and smuggling or even murdering. Therefore, there is no valuable impact on offenders who have been charged for smaller crimes. On the contrary, they only will acquire new negative practice.
In contrast, there are some solutions might help in alleviate such a problem. First of all, split prisoners into several sections based on their crime, to avoid sharing some negative experience with other dangerous prisoners. Second of all, enhancing the prisoners thoughts and skills by providing some theoretical and vocational sessions and prepared them to become a productive member of the global society. Denmark is playing as role model in dealing with prisoners, as the government educates offenderes as well as it provides them some practical sessions such as handicrafts and others in order to prepare them to be an active member of the society. Finally, there is no doubt that the type of punishment is playing a fundamental role in mitigating crime level after prisoners released. Therefore, many advance nations nowadays impose various valuable penalties on guilty individuals such as working as volunteer in elderly house or helping disable people. such this action has remarkable results on convicts' mentalities as it makes them to be more helpful and proactive in their communities.
To sum up, integrating all prisoners together is the main cause of many criminals to do more crimes. However, following the offered solutions might help offenders to become more productive for their societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes such as thefts, or dangerous driving can easily being influenced by other dan...
^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly will acquire new negative practice. In contrast, there are some solutions mi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 963, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...lderly house or helping disable people. such this action has remarkable results on c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in contrast, kind of, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2325 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76016190648 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8824222977 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.157894737 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144889369928 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441286174467 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378724642434 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095709060263 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289025172116 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.