It is undeniably true that since time immemorial different forms of detentions has used to punish offenders who are involved in a variety of crimes including ma-slaughter, arson, and armed-robber. While social experts are of the opinion that punishments should be based on the severity of the offense, quite a few arguing punishments should be the same for all of those who committed. The following paragraphs would shed light on both the merits and demerits.
Having a similar kind of penalizing would bring a couple of pros to society. Without a doubt, the most obvious advantage is that dwellers not only aware of criminal laws impose by the government but also believe that law is a law for all irrespective of kind of the misdeeds they committed. Thus, it would reduce the crime rate in any country. In addition to it, having fixed retribution for any violation would create a sophisticated platform for law bureaucrats because it would be easy for them to punish criminals quickly. As a result of this, felonies could be brought to justice without any delay.
However, the negative aspects of this practice need to be mentioned. The first thing to highlight is that it would be a complete injustice. To exemplify it, having the same law either for a small robbery or for a bank robbery would be unfair and it would have an adverse effect on people's mindset. As a result of this, there could be a rebellion from the citizens which would eventually create more criminals. It is also worth pointing out that, an offense without a motive would have to deal with kindness rather than punishing as a serious crime.
To recapitulate, this trend can have both positive and negative consequences. Although it has few merits such as awareness on law, faster growth in punishment, it has few drawbacks including rebellion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... and it would have an adverse effect on peoples mindset. As a result of this, there cou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91909385113 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81240759354 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0446352927 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24544560903 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690016882224 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664194193835 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134083768752 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561520330464 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.