Many People believe that social networking sites (such as facebook) have had a huge negetive impact on both individual and society, to what extend do you agree.
Down the centuries, there has been a drastic change in people’s communication. With the help of digital advancement, distances have shortened and all the barriers of long distance relationships have been removed. Despite of all the advantages of social networking, there are evident negative impacts not only over individuals but on the society as a whole. I moderately agree to this school of thought as its utilization is upon consumer’s discretion.
To begin with, one of the obvious bad impact of these sites is the over indulgence of youth. Youngsters are so encircled internet usage that they forget people around them and their core responsibilities. To elucidate it further, a new mania in people is to post everything over social sites. It has now become a status to check-in to the places you have visited for lunch/dinner or should post pictures of shopping you did. The concept of private life has become obsolete. It’s rightly said that access of everything is bad, there is no denial that people should have the ability to adapt changes based upon emerging needs and should also enjoy benefits of technological inventions; but this must be done to a reasonable extent.
On the contrary, such communication mediums help people reconnect with old friends or people they have considered lost. These sites give people freedom of speech and a platform where they can share their point of views. These networking sites are being utilized in many positive aspects as well, such as, advertisements, online business platform, non-profit organizations platform etc.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, innovation can never be tagged as positive and negative. It is the usage of such developments that that drives the impact. It is solely dependent on users to utilize in rational ways that it results in benefit eventually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., non-profit organizations platform etc. To recapitulate the aforementioned, inno...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24662162162 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09026717081 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1453454092 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19780682862 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562974691429 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410827187707 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104521956926 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385893414563 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.