Many people believe that T.V. media and news in general have detrimental effect on people's lives. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a widely held belief that media and broadcasting have a bad influence on the individual. I completely agree with this statement due to several reasons, which will be discussed in following paragraphs with suitable example.
The first and foremost reason is that television broadcast unrealistic and violence program. In other words, many producers develop program, which is full of violence and crime, to earn millions of views because more view gets more money. This type of program affects children and grown-ups mind and sometimes some criminal learns from this program to how to clean their crime. This ultimately leads to waste of time and money as it has negative effects on individual as well as society.
The second worth mentioning reason here is that adverts of television, radio and news channel also have a diminished effect on people spending as well as health. To justify, commercials create artificial wants. People often buy things and services that they do not need. This result in a debt of credit cards and sort of money. Furthermore, children are easily influenced by commercials and pester their parents to buy certain products such as fatty foods and sugary drinks and this leads them to obesity and related disease.
Moreover, news seems to be fake and alternate their facts because news outlets are often tightly controlled, either by the government or by business interests. So, this leads to society in the wrong direction and influence image of a political leader. For example, a recent survey conducted by an eminent media analyst David Moore revealed that 60 % of people influenced by news and change their decision during the election in Russia.
In conclusion, I agree that people’s lives negatively swayed by news channel and televisions in many ways.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13310580205 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67518250145 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62457337884 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5244502118 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205376088992 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647476680817 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819844446028 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128034712155 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08825086047 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.