Many people now live in societies where comsumer goods have become cheap.
Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?
The widespread usage of low cost products by people all around the world has become a frequent subject of debate in today’s life. This alarming trend has a number of pore and cons. However, for some reasons that I will discuss through this essay, I believe the advantages are more than disadvantages.
To begin with, if we take the view that all people has the right to use any things that they want, it is logical to defend the idea of less expensive products. Foods, as an illustrative example, is one of the main needs of individuals. The more cheap ingredients, result in more quality of meals, and even the number of meals. According to statistics, nowadays, more than one portion of the world population is suffering from starvation. Another example is clothes which is a vivid example of consumer goods. As a matter of fact, cheaper goods means less budget on consuming products, while more money could allocated for education or recreational activities such as traveling.
On the other hand, lower price of goods might encourage overexploitation. Materialism trend poses some serious threat to the world. Environmental damages will always be considered as a drawback which causes some major problems. To illustrate, production of cheap furniture needs more consuming materials such as wood or iron. To meet the demand of market, manufacturers have to exploit more natural resources such as forest or mines. In a long term prospective, the dearth of resources will be a significant concern.
In conclusion, all mentioned points lead to a concrete foundation which indicates that while production of cheaper products brings a new set of concerns, it is also true to say that there are more perks associated with this trend. Given this situation, it seems that government should prepared a solid plan to prevent those potential problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-10 | yaldaasgari | 11 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | yaldaasgari | 11 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 11
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? 11
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. 73
- Some people believe money is a less important factor than free time for quality of life. What do you think about it? What other factors are necessary to live a good quality of lifestyle? 73
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...mer goods. As a matter of fact, cheaper goods means less budget on consuming products...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'allocate'
Suggestion: allocate
...suming products, while more money could allocated for education or recreational activitie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90922659426 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8995392934 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.068400762834 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196640728962 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226152295796 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398892563922 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251947227039 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.