Many people say that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects equally. Others, however, believe that students should spend more time on subjects they like, or are good at.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, an ample emphasis has been placed on education and school curriculum. This essay thus first aims to investigate why some people assert studying particular courses that school-age children like is more beneficial; thereafter, it examines why others think students should study a variety of subjects, followed by my perception.
One aspect which some millennials believe justifies concentrating on a few liked school subjects by pupils can be identified as a higher chance of acquiring proficiency. If youngsters concentrate on what they are interested in, they will not become bored during their studies, allowing them to improve their skills more rapidly, thereby achieving a higher level of proficiency at an earlier age. This then will ensure them a successful life when they grow up. A study conducted by the USLA in 2017, for instance, showed that 71 percent of adolescents who focus on particular subjects that they like such as art, music, and painting turn out to be accomplished artists in their later years. However, the opposition put forward convincing arguments.
Another angle on this debate suggests students should study a variety of subjects. The real world necessitates numerous skills and therefore school curriculums should offer different disciplines for students to focus on, allowing them to obtain different abilities, which gives them more opportunities when they grow up. For example, Labor market statistics acknowledge that young professionals need to have a large number of abilities such as computer literacy, mathematical competency as well as interpersonal skills in order to be successful in job interviews. This illustrates the equal necessity of studying varied subjects.
In summary, it is clear that some proportions of young students will have more proficiency in some subjects if they concentrate on them; nonetheless, I believe that having a variety of skills provides more opportunities and hence juveniles should concentrate on different subjects whether they are interested in them or no.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e that young professionals need to have a large number of abilities such as computer literacy, ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51428571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04493929805 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.2358022073 49.4020404114 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.75 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233465232731 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762908319116 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606705440518 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146516566134 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454734491897 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.