In this highly competitive world, people have been spending a significant amount of time in computing and working in their workplaces. This trend is not necessarily a positive development because it can lead to health problems as well as disruption of families and personal relationships.
To commence with, there is nothing to prove that long working hours have improved productivity. They fail to concentrate on work and take a long time to finish tasks assigned at their jobs. Apart from this, traveling far from work does not help them either. Secondly, in many major cities, people have to devote several hours to communicate to their offices. At last, they reach home braving the traffic and a hard-working day. As a result, little energy has left in individuals while coming to their homes after a busy schedule of work in their daily lives. According to a BBC survey report, people who are spending long hours in companies are likely to develop health problems such as heart disease and dementia. Therefore, this kind of working trend has been a drawback for individuals.
The work-life balance has been a detrimental effect on employees as they are spending long hours at the offices working as well as traveling. Consequently, they get little time to spend with their dear ones. For instance, parents, who work long hours, often fail to take proper care of their young children. Besides, adults who are working overtime are unable to enjoy their leisure time due to the heavy workload in their firms. This kind of working has badly affected their health.
In conclusion, extra working hours in companies do not improve the productivity of workers as well as employers. As this trend has disadvantages of the individuals' social life. Thus, work-life balance is essential to lead a contented life. Besides, it is hoped that companies will take initiatives for removing the overtime workload on their workers and will allow proper working hours to employees at their jobs.
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him Another friend of yours is willing to go Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain why you cannot go anymore say who can go instead of you say why this person i 73
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 78
- You are attending a night course in the school You are not happy with some parts of the course Write a letter to the school director about this In your letter you should say which course you are studying what things you are not happy about what you expect 78
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 67
- You went to your friend house and had meal Write a letter to your friend thanking him and his family for the meal Tell you enjoyed about the meal Thanks to his parents and what you think about them Suggest arrangements for his invite at your place 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tasks assigned at their jobs Apart from this traveling far from work does not help t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93292682927 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61984458762 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 328.0 20.2975951904 1616% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1618.0 106.682146367 1517% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 328.0 20.7667163134 1579% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 161.0 7.06120827912 2280% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357348997324 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.357348997324 0.084324248473 424% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231343476578 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474508303385 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 165.8 13.0946893788 1266% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -252.98 50.2224549098 -504% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 130.0 11.3001002004 1150% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.79 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.23 8.58950901804 270% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 133.2 10.1190380762 1316% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.