As every coin has two sides, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that the technology has been doing a wonderful job of bringing certain advances in the lives of employees while others emphasize that it has resulted in negative outcomes for labors. In this essay, I will discuss both views in detail, and conclude my opinion.
On the one side, various factors make a section of people advocate that technology has given benefits to the workers. To commence with, the advent of new technologies where a machine is constructed in such a way that it can do multiple tasks at a single time. This kind of development has resulted to produce efficiency and productivity in the work. Besides, the workload has been reduced with the help of machines because of automated tasks which were initially handled by workers. But now, labors only monitored the tasks which is done by machines.
On the flip side, modern technology also has some drawbacks on worker’s lives. Firstly, employees forget their hand skills as new technology comes in the modern society. Secondly, sometimes a small fault in technology creates an accident that might take a laborer's life. Last but not the least, some workers are technologically challenged where it is difficult for them to grasp the working of new machine programs and others forms of technology. Therefore, technologies force some laborers to work out of their comfort zone.
In my profound opinion, although using new machines in the wrong way or default machines might result in severe effects, I believe technology has given fruitful benefits and has improve the life of workers by reducing the workload and increasing efficiency and productivity in their daily tasks at work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laborers'' or 'laborer's'?
Suggestion: laborers'; laborer's
...y creates an accident that might take a laborers life. Last but not the least, some work...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...ogy has given fruitful benefits and has improve the life of workers by reducing the wor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79552045274 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2066312264 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27862699831 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855080913141 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613721069304 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151605497404 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466948425961 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.