Some people say that cars are best to use in cities while others think that bicycles are better. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that cars are the best form of transport communications in the cities while others emphasize that bicycles are far better for traveling in the metropolis areas. However, in my opinion, both mediums of communication have their pros and cons while traveling into cities.
On the one side, numerous factors make a section of people advocate that cars are the best form of transports to compute at our destinations and have many reasons to substantiate it. First and foremost, automobiles such as four-wheelers and two-wheelers are considered as primary means of transport, especially in cities for individuals to reach daily at their workplaces. Secondly, this kind of transport provides convenience and comfort to commuters while computing to their workplaces. To exemplify, corporate workers, business-person prefers cars in primary means of transport to compute to their offices which are far away from their residence.
On the flip side, a group of people believes that bicycles are better than cars for myriad reasons. Chiefly, people who prefer to ride bicycles instead of four-wheelers in their daily travel have not to face the traffic congestion issues. Furthermore, this kind of traveling maintains our body's physically fit. Besides, it keeps our environment healthy since carbon emission from cars causes pollution in the atmosphere which is severe for the health of individuals. Nevertheless, people cannot travel too far distances from their bicycles, in such cases, automobiles are recommended for travel.
In my profound opinion, both types of transport communications have their pros and cons. I think that individuals shall precisely decide which is convenient, comfort, time-saving, and economical in traveling to their destinations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ros and cons while traveling into cities On the one side numerous factors make a ...
^^^
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...their workplaces To exemplify corporate workers businessperson prefers cars in primary ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which are far away from their residence On the flip side a group of people belie...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...automobiles are recommended for travel In my profound opinion both types of tra...
^^^
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mical in traveling to their destinations
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, i think, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46071428571 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01805578383 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 280.0 20.2975951904 1379% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1529.0 106.682146367 1433% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 280.0 20.7667163134 1348% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 125.0 7.06120827912 1770% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206330597409 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206330597409 0.084324248473 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133881937298 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647013192171 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 144.3 13.0946893788 1102% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -221.18 50.2224549098 -440% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 113.7 11.3001002004 1006% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.87 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.87 8.58950901804 255% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 114.0 10.1190380762 1127% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 114.0 10.7795591182 1058% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.