As population is growing, new accommodation is needed for people in cities, and because of the density of buildings, there is no chance to add new housing except in countryside. Some people are opposed to such decision as they think the countryside should be kept untouched. In my view, by providing suitable infrastructure, it is possible to build new places.
It is true that, nowadays, there is a big demand in housing especially in main cities. Apparently, people prefer to go to cities and settle down near their workplace where are preferably located in important cities. As a result, there would be a lot of problems. Firstly, the quality of air is getting poor in cities and people suffer these conditions which have made them a lot of problems, such as respiratory disease. Secondly, because of high demand in housing, the property prices and rents are going higher. People should spend a lot of money on renting, even on a very small flat. All of these problems make people think about living on outskirts of towns and cities. So, it is inevitable to keep the countryside preserved.
However, some people are opposed to this plan. It seems that they are concerned about the structure of the countryside. Although it is a very good idea to protect these areas from massive constructions, based on the problems mentioned above, I think we could expand the houses for people in order to make the life easier in these places as well as help the city life to improve incrementally. It just need the government to think of necessary infrastructure to develop the countryside in a way that its basic structure and calmness would not be disturbed. For example, by having some limitation on building construction, or keeping some lands and fields untouched, people could be encouraged to have a balanced attitude towards some little changes to the countryside.
In conclusion, While I agree that we should preserve the countryside and try not to spread population there, just like cities, I believe it is time to make some new houses there to be able to reduce the population density in cities and towns.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89136490251 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86548710762 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523676880223 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3784436692 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.294117647 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227053894478 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673478703611 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541660862437 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14370608537 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634099683705 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.