In many places traditional food has been replaced by international fast food. This had adverse effects on the individuals and society.
Do you agree or disagree.
Many argue that global fast food took the place of classical and domestic food in several locations. They claim that such replacement negatively affects the people and communities. I total disagree with this statement and shall point the positive effects of universal fast food on the whole country.
Firstly, eating international fast food does not entirely mean abandoning old classical food. To elaborate on this, many traditional meals still served and requested by all segments of the society despite that fact that fast food chains was introduced to a lot of countries several decades ago. For example, in Egypt, worldwide fast food chains like KFC and MacDonald are operating for more than 20 years now, yet beans and Koshary are the most famous Egyptian meals till today. In addition, global fast food provides different taste for the food. And for some, this difference can drive people to be more attracted to their classic food.
Secondly, International fast food helped indirectly in reviving the market for classic food restaurants. To illustrate, as more and more global fast food chains continue to open in new markets, more people became attracted to it. And as a human nature, people got bored of the same taste and wanted to try new recipes. This created a window of opportunity for local competitors, who are serving local meals, to reserve old fashion meals again and regain a last portion of customers whom they lost to the international food chain market. For instance, restaurants like Badawya in City Stars Mall and Om Hassan are now very famous restaurants and are always over crowded with customers although they serve Egyptian okra, Soup and chicken as their main meals.
To conclude, history proved that universal food could not have negatively affected the traditional food place. And in the same time, it is very clear that serving international food helped the local domestic food servers financially.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
...o it. And as a human nature, people got bored of the same taste and wanted to try new re...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14240506329 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62675003277 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3391888417 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320797457589 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132582715189 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812022385563 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232824606616 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565131868023 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.