One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that universe research is vastly expensive which needs to be spent to put halter on obstacles that exist in the world, and it is only possible to decline the number of such missions while others oppose it. I completely in favour of former view point. This essay would discuss both sides in following paragraphs.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that number of masses specially who are under poverty line, struggling with starvation.They do not have food to eat, place to live and clothes to wear, at the same time research on space is worthlessness for them, but if this money is utilised to solve problems of layman, poverty will be reduced for many years because space research cannot only contribute to put burden on the shoulder of authority, but also leads to numerous other catastrophic effects namely; poverty-stricken people are unable to provide education to their wards which become barrier in the way of employment.Consequently, they choose wrong path, and it leads them into the world of crime. Needless to say, money spend on orbit exploration is useless until such problems are not controlled.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned propositions is that it is only likely to meaningless because it is proved that at the moment, earth is the only place where life is possible, but several disasters like global warming, pollution, hurricanes and extreme weather conditions are threatening existence of living organisms, and that must not be ignored. So, countries should devote a great chunk of money to tackle these hurdles. It can be done only by reducing the cost of exploring the space. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicate that India invested almost 100 millions dollars to send their astronaut while 28% of total population slept hungry. Hence, it is apparent that why it is needed to reduce space researching programs.
However, a section of the society contradicts the above-said view by providing some justification. They reckon that expenditure for exploring other planets is the need of time, because population is increasing alarmingly. In coming future, new generations will have no space to live and to grow food in that condition other planets can be used to stay alive. Apart from it, solutions of many fatal deceases can be found from orbit exploration. NASA has witnessed that there is an alien planet which has probability to reveal plethora of mysteries that are beyond of human power. Therefore, it is admissible to use great chunk of fortune to research on space.
To conclude, having ponderd over above-stated it is crystal clear that although investment on space projects can sum up many mysterious things, it will be foolish task to ignore human problem. So, minimising number of missions is the best aid to sort out such issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...overty line, struggling with starvation.They do not have food to eat, place to live ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequently
...become barrier in the way of employment.Consequently, they choose wrong path, and it leads t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 709, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...of employment.Consequently, they choose wrong path, and it leads them into the world ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issible to use great chunk of fortune to research on space. To conclude, having ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 13.1623246493 251% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 41.998997996 202% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 503.0 315.596192385 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05765407555 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91159444764 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 176.041082164 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580516898608 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 151.789327688 49.4020404114 307% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.894736842 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4736842105 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225186172598 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058832275151 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552072427171 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116357405312 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01870474055 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.