Modern communications mean that it s no longer necessary to write letters To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

In this world of digitalisation, the technology in communication has proliferated in a dramatic way. People feel more comfortable using the modern devices rather that opting for the hand written paper letters to get in contact with another person. I am totally agree with this fact and will explain the great advantages in the below passages.

Firstly, the technology have replaced the paper based messaging and is far more appreciated in the society nowadays. It is easy to communicate with people from the ease of your home or office, infact while you are travelling through the technical devices and help of internet. Some of the great application invented by the developers are icing on the cake. Such as Whatsapp, facebook, skype and so on. Unlike conventional era, people do not have to write a letter through pen and then post it. It takes a lot of time to reach the letter to the destination. Sometime it delayed the emergency or news which needed immediate action. By the digital mode now, the information can be passed in fraction of seconds.

Secondly, the writing letters also uses papers, and we all know that the paper is made by cutting trees. So, it can affect the environment too. Consumption of time while delivering and sometime the post get missed would also be vanished when modern devices would be used.

To sum up, I agree that there is no need of the written letters these days, the communication has been changed over the couple of decades now and is a positive sign among human kind. People are now aware about modern technologies and after using it they feel more relaxed.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS General Training
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a dramatic way" with adverb for "dramatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ology in communication has proliferated in a dramatic way. People feel more comfortable using the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ntact with another person. I am totally agree with this fact and will explain the gre...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...technical devices and help of internet. Some of the great application invented by the devel...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83695652174 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68273308695 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4629996718 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4375 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199667992874 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515284477538 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472542099625 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114652567542 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418126769306 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.