Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent years, letter have vanished from our life. There are abundant of advance technological options available for people who help them connect with others more easily compared to writing letters. My view is that new communication channel does not have any place for letters, as the communication channels have drastically improved over years. Through the course of this essay I would like to showcase my points and calculations by considering various aspects of the statement.
Today a host of people have adapted to the latest technologies for communication purposes. This is because these systems are connected online which can be used from any part of the world. Furthermore, advancements in mobile phones have made it more comfortable to connect with far away people. My Father, for instance, who is working in USA can instantly make a video call to me in India using an online application called Whatsapp. It has become so comfortable for him, due to which he would never prefer to write letters to me.
Letters were an important part of human beings life when there was no proper means of communication in the conventional society. However contemporary society is fast paced, where people do not prefer waiting time. Nowadays, almost all the countries are equipped with internet facilities which has enable people to use them to connect globally. Hence, letters are no more used as a channel to transfer the information between people. Every response is expected to be quick , which can only be achieved using the latest systems.
I see equally potential evidence provided to support my viewpoint and hence I am think that one of the famous trend is the quick request-response system. Older ways like writing letters had delays and big waiting time. I am incline to believe that this trend will keep on evolving and many more new ways will play vital role in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...Letters were an important part of human beings life when there was no proper means of ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...pped with internet facilities which has enable people to use them to connect globally....
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... Every response is expected to be quick , which can only be achieved using the la...
^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
... to support my viewpoint and hence I am think that one of the famous trend is the qui...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
...s had delays and big waiting time. I am incline to believe that this trend will keep on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01592356688 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7714776628 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614649681529 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0377394337 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122366140613 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373022411121 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289568222973 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719383291605 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334054969907 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.