Modern technology allows the machine to perform the hard work instead of a human? Does this have a positive or negative effect on people? Give your opinion with examples.
These days, the human workforce is superseded by mechanical devices. I believe this trend has both positive and negative effects on all people, from the workers to the parties who receive services provided by these machines. In this essay, merits and demerits of such development are comprehensively discussed.
There are numerous benefits associated with using machines instead of humans. First and perhaps the most prominent is the decreased chances of people getting hurt. People are exposed to dangers in strenuous occupations such as working in metallurgy industry and car manufacturing factories. Therefore, utilizing mechanical operators like robots eliminates the threat of injuries in workers. Secondly, machines work faster and more efficiently. Mechanical devices do not need to take a break from work or rest because they do not get tired and can be put to work 24 hours a day. Consequently, in the same time frame, more products can be produced and there is more merchandise available for the people.
Conversely, there are drawbacks as well. Firstly, using synthetics instead of humans lead to an increase in unemployment rate. Modern technology, namely using robots, has rendered the human resource obsolete. Therefore, the number of available positions, particularly physically demanding jobs, has decreased and the workforce is dismissed. For example, research showed the unemployment rate in developing countries hiked after importing mechanical machines that replace human workers. Last but not least, the quality of produced items reduces by using machines because they do not possess the same precision and finesse as humans do.
All in all, as mentioned above, I personally believe performing tasks by machines instead of human has both advantages and disadvantages such as decreasing the hazards associated with hard jobs and raising of unemployment rate respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60069444444 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00866602949 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.573007018 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8823529412 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216768415192 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589663676487 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044837987713 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122446844657 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153534452759 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.