Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Since the modern technology has been introduced to the public life, there has been a non-ending debate about its impact to the environment. This argument has always suggested one of two solutions, whether people should go back to simpler lifestyle to reduce the effects of modern technology on our environment or to let scientists of technology provide alternative technological solutions that has less impact on nature. In my view as so many others, we do not prefer to go back to basic life rather than advancing the technology and negate its effects on mother nature.
In order to give a fair and just comparison of views, we will start with the first suggested solution to protect nature from technology's side effects. Having a simpler lifestyle suggested solution has two main points to discuss which are going back to nature and consume what it provides, and changing our life into a healthier lifestyle. Modernizing our lives has introduced so many products that are manufactured in factories using chemical and physical reactions that has negative effects on our earth, and the solution to such negative effects is going back to consume what nature provides rather than continuing to support man-made products. In addition, human beings has been consuming so many processed foods that again are created, packed, and distributed out of factories; not only that is affecting our environment, it is proven that it is affecting our general health which leads us to the second point where having a healthier lifestyle will help us protect our earth and our health too. To conclude this part, having a simpler lifestyle not only helps us protect our environment by consuming its natural products, it also helps us keep a healthier habits.
On the other hand, some has suggested that to let technology provide us the solution to its own negative effects to nature by keeping enhancing the technology to be more efficient and also to redirect the researches of scientists to figure a new ways and methods that will allow technology to serve humanity, and to be more green than before as well. Technology has been around over a decade now, and as anything in this life it requires time to reach its maturity stage in order to serve in near zero negative effects, thus people are suggesting that rather than stopping the use of technology it is better that we enhance it in ways that reduces if not eliminates the side effects. Moreover, governments are now adding one more additional target to technical products manufacturers and to scientists researching in this area which is to have a more green products that will not have almost any bad effects on earth and creatures living on it. In my opinion, technology and its products has increased and eased the life of all human beings of the globe in many ways, thus eliminating technology from our lives is something near to impossible these days. Thus I do prefer allowing and giving the chance for technology to grow more and to have an increase of governmental funds to the researches of greener technology.
Last but not least, the debate that arise from the technology's effect on earth in search for solutions has resulted in either going back to more of a basic lifestyle or allowing technology to solve its own effects. Therefore and suggested before, everything in life requires time to grow, and technology needs to grow more in order to have less if not no effects on earth and those living on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-05 | raeed.kriez | 87 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | itsshuvro | 55 | view |
- It has been suggested that everyone in the world wants to own a car a TV and a fridge Do you think the disadvantages of such a development outweigh its advantages Give your opinion 67
- You had some building work done in your home but you are unhappy with the outcome Write a letter to the builder and say describe the work done why are you not happy What do you want the builder to do about it 73
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phone Is this a positive development or a negative one Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them 61
- A while ago you lent a friend a suitcase which he she has not returned yet Write a letter to him her reminding to bring it back and say What suitcase and when did he she borrow it Why do you need it back What he she should do about it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...omething near to impossible these days. Thus I do prefer allowing and giving the cha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ener technology. Last but not least, the debate that arise from the technolog...
^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ng technology to solve its own effects. Therefore and suggested before, everything in lif...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in fact, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 24.0651302605 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 41.998997996 212% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2882.0 1615.20841683 178% => OK
No of words: 587.0 315.596192385 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90971039182 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.20363070211 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72289887662 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427597955707 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 926.1 506.74238477 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7151628223 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.133333333 106.682146367 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.1333333333 20.7667163134 188% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249216649126 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977202765536 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703056812791 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167830442993 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551101573201 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.