Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
IIn recent years, the negative influences of the modern technology on environment have been gaining a great deal of attention around the world. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among the critics regarding how it will be resolved. While some people consider living a simplified lifestyle may improve the situation, however, I would contend that upgradation and customization of the technology will be more result-driven.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that modern technology has increased the productivity to meet the demand of the food items- the first fundamental human rights. But owing to this, we are damaging our food chain in a detrimental way, as in most cases, chemical fertilizers, pesticides even growth hormone sprays are causing health hazards to human. For this reason, people are talking about organic method of cultivation which is free from chemical hazards, albeit the production rate is quite slower than earlier. Furthermore, the science has also taught us on storing food in cold temperature. But unfortunately,, these freezing technologies are using some cooling liquids and gases those are harmful for the ozone layer. Therefore, fresh eating can be encouraged rather than storing. Even in case of healing certain simple health issues like cold and fever, we are highly depending on the medicines developed by using cutting-edge technologies. Rather, it could be handled by taking simple homegrown natural herbal medicine which is now being practiced in China and Japan.
Conversely, when it comes to the issue of meeting the increased food demand, the technology can make the organic farming method more productive. This can be done by developing vertical farming where within a less space bulk amount of cultivation can be done. In addition, when we think about freezing technologies, still the scientists can do more my developing environment friendly devices. On top of that, for tackling air pollution caused by the vehicle, walking cannot be a realistic approach. Hence, the fuel and engines are being changed in many countries where solar power and hydrogen-fusion cells are used to drive the car. For instance, in many countries already the hybrid version of petrol engine and e-tron technology are wiping out the old vehicles.
All things considered, we are almost on the brink of irreversible damage to our mother nature. Personally, I believe, modification of the modern technology rather than compromising life with so called simplicity may be adopted, further in the future, to redress the balance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detrimental way" with adverb for "detrimental"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...to this, we are damaging our food chain in a detrimental way, as in most cases, chemical fertilizers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...d in cold temperature. But unfortunately,, these freezing technologies are using s...
^^
Line 3, column 865, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e health issues like cold and fever, we are highly depending on the medicines developed by using cut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, talking about, in most cases, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31941031941 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9424407366 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616707616708 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0090423042 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.947368421 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42105263158 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12365746316 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357685642207 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353363116523 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794338817437 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324622280806 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.