Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces.
How do you think this has changed the way we work.
Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology?
Nowadays technology is commonly used at workplaces around the world. I think this has made people lazy and less active.
Undoubtedly technological advancements have proven extremely useful in many ways. Most important of them is that more efficient and consistent productivity can be gained with very fewer efforts. This also minimizes the errors as less manual inputs are required. Another benefit through technology is it saves a lot of time.
Nevertheless, despite the advantages above, I believe that the use of technology at work has some serious drawbacks. Firstly this could result in unemployment as less manual input is required. For instance, in my country according to the statistics released earlier this year, 30% of unemployment is the result of the increased adaptation of technology.
Furthermore, it is making people lazy and as a result of this they are not using their own senses and depending more on technology. This is resulting in less innovative ideas. Lastly, these days technology is also playing a role of communicator. For example, if people need any solution they simply search for it on the internet, this is decreasing socialization in society.
To conclude, in my opinion increasing the use of technology at workplaces is resulting in people not being active, unable to make decisions on their own and is also increasing the unemployment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...in less innovative ideas. Lastly, these days technology is also playing a role of co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 220.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28636363636 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09174788084 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7895299992 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0714285714 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145061095535 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552276963893 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291820500547 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901544787683 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422420094792 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.