In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing. Agree or disagree
With technological advancement, there has been a widespread assumption that the desirable attribution of animals to our meals or other fields such as healthcare or fashion is not necessary. This essay completely disagrees to this statement because animals contain irreplaceable nutrients for human lives and their considerable roles in the world’s development.
The main reason why animal-made food could not lack in daily meals is that this type of food such as beef, pork or chicken carried a large number of nutrients such as protein and lipid. These nutrients which are necessary for the full development, which cannot be found on other types of food like vegetable or fruit. By providing these supplements, the human immune system becomes much stronger compared to those do not eat the protein food, leading to a healthy and active body. For example, vegetarian people are likely to experience several physical health problems such as immune system related diseases or heart disease because the green food impossibly provides sufficient energy to fully activate human bodies.
Additionally, we cannot deny the remarkable role of animals in many specialized areas such as science or fashion. The rational reason for this phenomenon is that living animals have the nearly same structure and inner formation as that of man, which are the main sources for scientific projects. Without them, it is no doubt that human bodies would be carried out for scientific purposes, resulting in ethical issues. For instance, for a thousand years, the white mouse has been performed in the medical field, creating several milestones to treat many global diseases such as vaccines for a cure for diarrhoea or type I diabetes.
In conclusion, no matter how the world has changed, I wholeheartedly believe that living animals would be an eternal source for the world’s development in various fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d such as beef, pork or chicken carried a large number of nutrients such as protein and lipid. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...energy to fully activate human bodies. Additionally, we cannot deny the remarka...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32558139535 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86311667844 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.9722114972 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177236281832 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722781045618 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408639850173 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116868518419 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248415568399 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.