Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
The earth has been since decades; many generations passed through and kept their traditions and architecture thoughts. These days, a lot of money is spent on keeping old buildings and renovating them, but some people prefer to spend money on new building more than renovating.
Architect is changing and moving beyond imagination, by creating new buildings, museums and town halls. First, many cities were discovered lately, and the governments are spending money, by creating new concepts, ideas and making modern cities. Second, many studies showed that building new places is less cost than renovating and entering new technology to it is more secure and safe. However, these days constructing huge towers can be done in small places, with many levels even there will be underground areas, for car park and stock rooms. For example, Dubai city, the governor announced that buildings life period isn’t more than 40 years. From my side I disagree, were old buildings must be kept and renovate it, to preserve history and culture.
On the other hand, old buildings are attractive and catch up many creative people from all over the world. Historic structures have their glory and a story beyond, that’s why people prefer to keep memories and take care of it. Second, the government or council can benefit from ancient buildings by renovating and turn it into museums or town halls, and talk about its culture and history, were people can visit. Moreover, renovation budget is higher than building a new place, but keeping history building attract tourists from all the world and encourage the tourist sector and revitalize the economic situation of the country. For example, France renovated all its old buildings, cathedrals and turned them into tourist places or museums, and they are investing from them. In my opinion I agree, that renovation will attract tourists and maintains the history of the country.
Finally, two different views some people prefer to spend money on creating new buildings, others think renovation is the best option to preserve the heritage. In my opinion I think that, even by renovation we can get out with modern places and benefit from and save our history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...Dubai city, the governor announced that buildings life period isn't more than 40 yea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...and talk about its culture and history, were people can visit. Moreover, renovation ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, i think, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 10.4138276553 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16155988858 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55338938128 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559888579387 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.705431317 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189600941915 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697366989321 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626904558433 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126750857687 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419941641446 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.